How do family and non-family ties affect knowledge sharing in SMEs in a developing country? Linking social capital and network strength
How do family and non-family ties affect knowledge sharing in SMEs in a developing country? Linking social capital and network strength
You can search multiple keywords with something like this:
label:robotics + label:machine_learning
in the author search. Narrowing by country can be trickier. You can potentially narrow by the email address. For example, if their profile is verified with a UK email address it will end in .ir. Thus you can search:
label:robotics + label:machine_learning + .ir
and only get UK researchers. You'll probably get some false positives and negatives with this technique so it's not perfect but will help narrow the scope.
Here's a related question pertaining to narrowing country on Google Scholar:
Google Scholar: how to exclude some countries from the search?
نمونه جستجو
Profiles (google.com)
پاسخ‌هایش دقیق و با منبع است و حکایت از بار سنگینی دارد که از اندوخته‌های علمی‌اش با خود حمل می‌کند. متولد ۱۹۵۰ میلادی در نیویورک است و در حال حاضر به عنوان استاد‌تمام مدیریت و استاد‌تمام اقتصاد، به ترتیب در دانشکده کسب‌وکار و دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی دانشگاه استنفورد فعالیت می‌کند. تخصص‌اش نظریه بازی‌است و علایق پژوهشی‌اش شامل انتخاب پویا، مدیریت منابع انسانی و علم اقتصاد رفتاری است. عمده شهرتش به خاطر تحلیل‌اش در زمینه مدل‌های انتخاب پویا و نظریه بازی غیرمشارکتی است، به‌ویژه ایده تعادل پی در پی؛ ایده‌ای که آن را با کمک همکارش در دانشکده کسب‌وکار استنفورد، یعنی رابرت ویلسون توسعه داد.
Coase/Williamsonian transaction costs
Coase transaction costs
Williamsonian transaction costs
Marion Fourcade (UC-Berkeley): Economics: The View from Below. Rune Moller Stahl (Copenhagen): Economic Theory, Politics and the State in the Neoliberal Epoch. Erik Angner (Stockholm): We’re All Behavioral Economists Now.
To what extent do we know our own minds when making decisions? Variants of this question have preoccupied researchers in a wide range of domains, from mainstream experimental psychology (cognition, perception, social behavior) to cognitive neuroscience and behavioral economics. A pervasive view places a heavy explanatory burden on an intelligent cognitive unconscious, with many theories assigning causally effective roles to unconscious influences. This article presents a novel framework for evaluating these claims and reviews evidence from three major bodies of research in which unconscious factors have been studied: multiple-cue judgment, deliberation without attention, and decisions under uncertainty. Studies of priming (subliminal and primes-to-behavior) and the role of awareness in movement and perception (e.g., timing of willed actions, blindsight) are also given brief consideration. The review highlights that inadequate procedures for assessing awareness, failures to consider artifactual explanations of "landmark" results, and a tendency to uncritically accept conclusions that fit with our intuitions have all contributed to unconscious influences being ascribed inflated and erroneous explanatory power in theories of decision making. The review concludes by recommending that future research should focus on tasks in which participants' attention is diverted away from the experimenter's hypothesis, rather than the highly reflective tasks that are currently often employed.
In analyses run by a team, researchers take on multiple roles:
as inventors who create ideas and hypotheses;
as optimistic analysts who scrutinize the data in search of confirmation; and
as devil's advocates who try different approaches to reveal flaws in the findings. The very team that invested time and effort in confirmation should subsequently try to make their hard-sought discovery disappear.
1.Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work | Nature
